22 training and target ammunition, but the problem with most low-power target loads is that they simply don’t generate enough pressure to reliably cycle a blowback. Eliminating sonic boom greatly reduces noise and muzzle blast and offers a quiet alternative to traditional rimfire target ammunition. By reducing velocities to subsonic levels CCI’s Quiet-22 Semi-Auto ammunition avoids the sonic boom generated when an object travels faster than the speed of sound. That’s well below the speed of sound (1125.3 feet per second), and the makes this ammunition subsonic. 22 semiauto firearms.ĬCI’s Quiet-22 Semi-Auto comes in 50-count boxes and fires 45-grain lead round nose bullets at a muzzle velocity of 835 feet per second. 22 rimfire ammunition offers a low cost, low-velocity target and hunting load that, as the name implies, will also reliably run in. Higher noise levels can not only damage your hearing but your relationship with neighbors, too.ĬCI, the leading rimfire manufacturer in the world, has developed a solution to reduce noise without a suppressor. That means shooters and hunters who don’t have a stamp to purchase and own a suppressor have to deal with higher noise levels-damaging noise levels-than our counterparts in other parts of the world. I guess some of the pistol shooters were having problems with it last year and found some that wouldn't fire after turning and shooting again.ĮTA: I haven't shot Thunderbolts in years, but have heard a lot of quality control complaints on them also, 4 or 5% failure to fire.American citizens benefit from the protections guaranteed in the Second Amendment, but the sale of suppressors is more restrictive here than in many other countries. I've read lately their may be problems with a lot of Standard Velocity and primer consistency. Since then I've shot Aguila Match Rifle, worked fine in a pistol, and after that case CCI Standard Velocity for the past 7 years or so. It was so bad a fellow shooter gave me a box of CCI Green Label to finish the night. After Sea Duty kept me from shooting for a couple seasons I picked up some Target 22 and it had several Failure to Fires in 30 rounds. I noticed the reduction in recoil and more time to shoot Timed and Rapid targets. As the years went by I started shooting the Remington Target 22. My wife would get me 2 packs for Christmas.Īnyhow, used to shoot fairly well with it. Sam's Club used to sell it in 2 brick packs for Christmas. Ruger MKII 22/45,no mods, and Thunderbolts. Seeing only good reviews online, I thought I'd share this review with y'all. So I just ordered 5,000 rounds of the CCI SV. The harder recoil in the SW22 and the unreliability in the 10/22 scared me away. The Blazer seemes to take a deeper primer hit indentation than the CCI SV. Accuracy: PoA was consistently PoI (using Vortex Viper red dot) Both CCI Stinger and CCI SV rim diameter averaged the same - 0.272 - 0.273, so rim diamter doesntt seem to be the cause of the bolt riding over the CCI Blazer rounds The CCI SV has always fed 99.99% reliably. A slightly greater recoil impulse was barely noticeable. Why it causes FtFire in the 10/22 and not the SW22 eludes me. By meaurement the Blazers are about 0.032" shorter than the Standard Velocity. TdK 10/22 - of the 120ish rounds fired, about 7 failures to feed, with the bolt riding over the cartridge and denting the side of the round. Accuracy: PoA was consistently PoI (using Vortex Viper red dot) But when measuring string times in hundredths of a second, the Balzerwould be a time handicap. Its 22 rf.were not talking 300 WinMag here. That it was as noticeable as it was did suprise me. That it would have a greater recoil at 150 fps faster is not suprising. SW22 - 100 % reliability with a measurably greater recoil impulse. I fired approximately 120 rounds in both guns, and observed the following:ĬCI Blazer, 38 grain, 1235 fps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |